(December 4, 2021 at 3:28 am)Helios Wrote: IA has to twist and turn to make stuff fit a bizarre(refuted) narrative
Care to tell me how it's attacking science to give definitions directly from the NIH website?
Care to tell me how it's attacking science when Fauci says everyone needs to get vaccinated, and is criticized for his take because having immunity from getting the virus is likely better than the vaccines? Why don't you care about what the data has to say about this? Who's the one really pushing science aside here? It's you, my friend.
Also, Fauci recently said everyone needs to take these boosters, because as he puts it, "It's just looking at what I think are going to turn out to be the facts." https://www.nytimes.com/2021/11/12/podca...shots.html They're winging this as they go along, and science is about rigorous debate. Not orthodoxy and censoring and shutting debate down, especially in an unfolding situation like this. Scientific consensus in a developing situation is not the same as scientific consensus with years and years of hindsight either.
