(November 19, 2011 at 7:53 am)aleialoura Wrote:(November 18, 2011 at 10:45 pm)ChristianT Wrote: A couple things faulty with your thoughts...
1) God didn't feed them the tree of knowledge of morals. He gave them every other fruit except the remaining two. They had a chance themselves to eat the eternal life fruit. God never said anything about not eating from it. But a+e chose to be deceived into eating the fruit of knowledge of morals.
Except you're wrong.
Genesis 2:17 Wrote:But of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, you shall not eat of it: for in the day that you eat thereof you shall surely die.
Quote:2) if they had no previous knowledge of morals, how could they value what they know not?
Which would lead to the very human reaction of curiosity. What good father would tempt his children with something so intriguing and deadly? What kind of fucked up shitbrick is this god?
Quote:3) just because I don't agree that man is a better parent doesn't mean I'm not a thinker, it just means I'm not an errant thinker.
A) Maybe if you were among idiots who bought the same bullshit you do, sweetie, but we don't buy that bullshit here. The fact that you don't think humans are better parents than a god (who basically put a loaded gun in his child's hand and warned them not to pull the trigger just to make sure that their listening ears were on) means that you're grotesquely immoral.
A) ok, assuming G-d doesn't exist (your assumption), what is morality? what is it made of? carbonucleic acid? or how much electric energy does it's impulse have? please scientifically prove that thoughts and opinions are material made of atoms or energy.
