Hello, I'm AthiestAtheist!

[Cinjin]

---

So you think a symbol related to the pursuit of science is more related to the symbol of atheism than a symbol for no (which it isn't)? Seriously? You have successfully shown to me that you don't really know what you're talking about, so I'm not going to continue this any further.

---

ah yes ... one of my favorite rebuttals. The "you don't know what you're talking about" argument.

To answer your question: every atheist I have ever known requires evidence for all things. The symbol of the Atom represents that ideology - as an atom is tangible evidence and is of course the building block for all things in existence. Do you not see the MASSIVE connection? Tacky, do YOU not see this?

Also, I didn't invent the symbol and it is not the universal sign for atheism (there isn't one). Don't change my argument to fit your week point. I'm not saying that it should or should not be used, but rather that it is a much better symbol than a generic NO sign ... which is what your avatar is. Pretending that it doesn't get it's design from a NO sign is just your own idiocy protecting your poorly made and biased argument.

Tacky - please do tell me why you would kudos such a silly post of his??? I'm just so curious ... you're usually very reasonable.