Pitbulls

[Goosebump]

Valid, I did just ask why you are afraid of them. I didn't ask that you stick around to learn anything. That would have been on you as a critical thinker.

Now you can fuck off.

I do believe it is my thread... so the burden of... well "fuck off" is on you sir. As in, stop reading / replying to it.

---

IF this is a place of science then science should matter and not just google searches.

In this study, pitbull-type dogs were misidentified 60% of the time (62 were visually identified as pitbull-type dogs but only 25 had DNA signatures from any of the pitbull-type breeds). Therefore, this study determined that the majority (60%) of dogs identified as pitbull-type dogs do not have DNA signatures from any of the four pitbull-type breeds.

I think here if anywhere, the ability and efficacy of the human witness is in question.

In this study, the majority (152 of 244 or 62%) of dogs with pitbull-type DNA had less than a 50% DNA concentration from pitbull-type ancestry. Therefore, this study determined that of the 40% of dogs labeled as "pitbulls" that actually have pitbull-type DNA (study #1), the majority (62%) of these dogs have less than a 50% DNA concentration from pitbull-type ancestry.

The DNA evidence in scientific studies reveals that the breed information for the vast majority of bite-related incidents (including fatal attacks) attributed to pitbull-type dogs is inaccurate and not reliable. Instead, the scientific data and DNA information validates that the majority of dogs implicated in these incidents are in fact non-pitbull type breeds or numerous different mixed breeds that have been misidentified as "pitbulls" or pitbull-type dogs.