RE: Covid 19 conspiracies dump
January 9, 2022 at 11:15 pm
(This post was last modified: January 9, 2022 at 11:30 pm by The Architect Of Fate.)
Quote:Ok. So you admit there are some adverse health effects in some number of people. What's the chance of getting an adverse health effect from the vaccine if you don't take it? Zero risk. That sounds better to me than 'some risk'. So, this actually does mean something. Yes, some risk is inferior to no risk, when we are talking about nurses who already have significant immunity from natural immunity. Why take that extra risk, no matter how small it may be, when it's entirely unnecessary? Go along to get along? Just do it to prove to the people that you deserve your job, when you've been risking your health throughout the pandemic, taking care of covid patients all the way through, while you were hailed as a hero on the news, daily, but now are being smeared as the villains of the story? Just give in to authoritarianism because you don't want people to think you're dumb or anti-vaxx?There is never zero risk in anything. That's not an excuse. The risks from any serious adverse effects from the vaccine as compared to Covid are so ridiculously tiny you would have to be completely irrational not taking it when there is a far higher risk that natural immunity will fail you and you will both get a new variant or worst pass it on to someone else.

(January 9, 2022 at 9:38 pm)Rev. Rye Wrote: And yet the risks of getting COVID are still a shitton more common than the side effects from the vaccine. Those side effects are measured in cases per hundred thousand. The risks from getting COVID? Well, 1 in 4 end up still having symptoms for over a month after their initial diagnosis. A couple cases per hundred thousand vs 1 in 4. I could just be a libcuck, but I like the odds of vaccination more than those of COVID. And natural immunity has less of a guarantee of reinfection than vaccination. We've been over this.Also need i mention the numbers against natural immunity get worst when we consider Omicron
Also, risking your health when there's a pretty clear chance of catching COVID is okay, but the comparatively negligible chance of an adverse reaction to a vaccine is where you draw the line? This makes zero sense to me. Even taking into account the whole "rarer events get more press coverage, and therefore, the risks are clearer to the average person" thing, because I still hear more about people dealing with COVID long-term than people getting adverse reactions from vaccines, and a nurse treating COVID patients will almost certainly SEE more cases of long-haul patients than bad reactions to the vaccine.
And if you think mandatory vaccines are authoritarianism, well, you've almost certainly been subject to mandatory vaccinations, even if it was just as a kid, and nobody (with the possible exception of some Jenny McCarthy types) was wailing about it being authoritarianism. And the COVID-19 vaccines probably have a higher efficacy than the shots you got as a kid.
TL;DR:
"Change was inevitable"
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
![[Image: Canada_Flag.jpg?v=1646203843]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=cdn.shopify.com%2Fs%2Ffiles%2F1%2F0630%2F5310%2F3332%2Fproducts%2FCanada_Flag.jpg%3Fv%3D1646203843)
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
![[Image: Canada_Flag.jpg?v=1646203843]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=cdn.shopify.com%2Fs%2Ffiles%2F1%2F0630%2F5310%2F3332%2Fproducts%2FCanada_Flag.jpg%3Fv%3D1646203843)
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM