(November 20, 2011 at 5:25 pm)Norfolk And Chance Wrote: There is no reason for god to exist unless you suppose there MUST be a creator. That is just your supposition, not a logical reason for him to exist.If the supposition results in the only logical conclusion that works, wouldn't that be that reason?
(November 20, 2011 at 5:49 pm)Faith No More Wrote: The one thing agreed upon here is that there is no verifiable evidence for god. How does it follow then that believing is the reasonable position?Because verifiable evidence isn't the only kind of evidence.