RE: Subsequent truths
November 21, 2011 at 6:09 am
(This post was last modified: November 21, 2011 at 6:38 am by Norfolk And Chance.)
Verifiable evidence is the only evidence that will make something an accepted truth.
What you are saying is that your acceptable evidence required to believe something to be true is much lower than that of a skeptic. I only hope I'm never in court with you or any of your xtian chums in in the jury.
As for your first point which answers my point - don't care, it's just becoming meaningless meaningless tit for tat again.
So you accept that primitive man trying to explain something he didn't understand as god?
Yet you believe in this god? Are you fucking retarded?
What you are saying is that your acceptable evidence required to believe something to be true is much lower than that of a skeptic. I only hope I'm never in court with you or any of your xtian chums in in the jury.
As for your first point which answers my point - don't care, it's just becoming meaningless meaningless tit for tat again.
(November 20, 2011 at 11:21 pm)Godschild Wrote: What is your take on dark matter and dark energy, mine is that science claims that it exists, yet there is no valid evidence for either, it is no more than primitive man trying to explain something they do not understand, that would be God. So what kind of logic is it that would believe in dark matter and energy.
So you accept that primitive man trying to explain something he didn't understand as god?
Yet you believe in this god? Are you fucking retarded?
You are currently experiencing a lucky and very brief window of awareness, sandwiched in between two periods of timeless and utter nothingness. So why not make the most of it, and stop wasting your life away trying to convince other people that there is something else? The reality is obvious.
