RE: Covid 19 conspiracies dump
January 15, 2022 at 2:28 pm
(This post was last modified: January 15, 2022 at 2:28 pm by LadyForCamus.)
(January 15, 2022 at 4:44 am)Irreligious Atheist Wrote:(January 14, 2022 at 7:07 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote: @Irreligious Atheist
Why do you reject scientific consensus in favor of the views of a minority of scientists and/or medical professionals? Because the latter set feeds your pre-conclusions? That’s called “confirmation bias.”
Why do you shit all over the scientific method and support squashing debate within the scientific community with mass censorship? I'm the only one that is actually defending the scientific process here. You are telling people to stop asking questions. Other people are cheerleading for censorship and shutting down and censoring scientists that disagree with them. It's gross, and this pandemic has caused you to betray your former principles. You now worship the priest class, and you are suffering from mass formation psychosis.
Consensus science by intense coercion and censorship
And like I've already posted, scientific consensus with hindsight means a hell of a lot more than scientific consensus in a rapidly developing situation. They are not the same thing at all. How can you try to act like they are? Galileo went against the consensus too, and you are supporting the shutting down of scientists and scientific debate. It's shameful that you've thrown all of your principles under the bus, because some people are getting sick with covid. I will stick to my principles, regardless.
You wouldn’t know the scientific method if it bit you in the ass, ya looney.
Anyway, you sound triggered. Try not to get hysterical; it’s not a good look for you manly men. Or so you say.
Nay_Sayer: “Nothing is impossible if you dream big enough, or in this case, nothing is impossible if you use a barrel of KY Jelly and a miniature horse.”
Wiser words were never spoken.
Wiser words were never spoken.