(January 16, 2022 at 2:52 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote:Imo this is a clear case(January 16, 2022 at 2:50 pm)Angrboda Wrote: How does this not qualify as rape apologetics?
The report has been made.
Boru
(January 16, 2022 at 12:53 pm)WinterHold Wrote: Of course it's a 100% on the attacker; but also when a female is "half naked" and producing sexual sounds in front of me; she is "inviting the male" for sexual activity, so it should be considered also.He is trying to eat is cake while still having it. He says that its 100% on the attacker, while at the same time suggesting its the women who "make him do it".
Similar to a cat making "mating sounds".
Comparing women to cats making mating sounds, just because they dress in a certain way, that is disgusting beyond belief. The part where he suddenly (and without any other reason than to blame the soon-to-be victims by now comparing them to cats) injects "producing sexual sounds" into the discussion is when he dropped his pretense of not hating women, and showed his real ugly face.
Cetero censeo religionem delendam esse
