RE: Covid 19 conspiracies dump
January 24, 2022 at 8:07 pm
(This post was last modified: January 24, 2022 at 8:11 pm by Irreligious Atheist.)
(January 24, 2022 at 8:00 pm)Rev. Rye Wrote:(January 24, 2022 at 7:53 pm)Irreligious Atheist Wrote: Have you looked at the data? We're not talking about whether getting the vaccine is safer than getting the virus, and I've never made the claim that getting the virus is safer than getting the vaccine. Right now, we're talking about the reality that getting covid gives you excellent immunity, which the CDC data confirms, and which Helios said was BS for ages, and Helios said that any scientist making that claim or suggesting that should be censored, so as it turns out, he wanted reality to be censored, because it disagreed with his political motives.
I should point out that you explicitly stated it's better, not just in this thread, but in this very page of the thread. And even when you cited a paper from the CDC, they pointed out that, even if natural immunity is fairly good, vaccination is both more effective and safer. The same damn paper that you cited.
Hell, its last sentence was, and I quote:
Quote:Primary COVID-19 vaccination, additional doses, and booster doses are recommended by CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices to ensure that all eligible persons are up to date with COVID-19 vaccination, which provides the most robust protection against initial infection, severe illness, hospitalization, long-term sequelae, and death.
What the fuck are you even talking about?
Of course they are going to suggest boosters. They're the freakin CDC. That doesn't mean that their data shows that taking a booster is necessary when you already have natural immunity. Look at the actual data, my dude, rather than focusing on a sentence. You know better than that. The data shows that natural immunity is better than someone who has been vaccinated but has not contracted covid. Show me where the data shows that Dr. John Campbell is incorrect in his summary of the data.