RE: Transgenderism in the tech industry
January 31, 2022 at 7:06 pm
(This post was last modified: January 31, 2022 at 7:07 pm by BLDM.)
(January 31, 2022 at 7:04 pm)Fake Messiah Wrote:(January 31, 2022 at 6:44 pm)BLDM Wrote: Hi. As I was saying to someone else earlier, it's my initials. But you can call me Boris or Brandon. As in let's go Brandon.
You mean like:
https://mycbs4.com/amp/newsletter-daily/...-supremist
Yes, exactly like the words in that photo. But if that's too triggering, Boris is fine too.
(January 31, 2022 at 7:05 pm)Rev. Rye Wrote:(January 31, 2022 at 5:11 am)BLDM Wrote: Today I read an article about RFID technology used to inventory military weapons, and the tech security loopholes they have discovered in those systems. One of the hackers who pointed out the vulnerabilities was Kristin Paget. Having worked in that field before, I am automatically skeptical whenever I read quotes from a female cyber security/hacking "expert" as usually they are either brand new in their career or not what they say they are.
I googled the name. Sure enough, I had reason to be skeptical. Kristin Paget is a transexual individual, formerly known as Chris Paget.
... So why is this a problem?
Quote:Down the road think of how many transexuals wind up in the tech community, the cyber security community, and with disproportionate influence over public discourse and policy. Is it any wonder silicon valley leans the way they do? Just imagine how many of them also work within government IT systems (seen it first hand).Because the more education one ends up getting, the more likely it is that they're going to lean left. This has been known for a long time, and even long before trans issues became major.
It's not.