(February 1, 2022 at 3:32 pm)The Grand Nudger Wrote: Platinga doesn't make any basic mistakes in his argument. The form is valid. Hence it's somewhat misleading designation as a successful argument. From it being possible that it's necessary that p, a person can infer that it's necessary that p.
The form is indeed valid, even as it is valid in Craig’s version. But validity of form isn’t why the argument fails.
Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
