Modal ontological argument

[R00tKiT]

I am not sure I follow. possible world semantics..?? Maybe there are correct formulations of your argument, I just think the one you presented is plainly false. In one sentence you say that there exists a world where nothing exists i.e. there exists a possible world which doesn't exist. That's impossible by definition.

Not in possible world semantics.  There is a possible world which is empty.  The world exists..... but nothing exists in it.

The world exists in what sense?? If you think of it as an empty container, then a container exists, the possible world is then a big fat container out there.. not the nothing Angrboda is using in her argument