All scholars make mistakes, but, typically, less so in print, especially, if a scientific paper, article or book has been peer-reviewed and refereed.
Dr. Schroeder's errors (the above was not the only one) indicate some sloppy scholarship; if he, as a physicist, can err on something so fundamental, what does that say about his other claims?
Dr. Schroeder's errors (the above was not the only one) indicate some sloppy scholarship; if he, as a physicist, can err on something so fundamental, what does that say about his other claims?
