RE: Illustrating the burden of proof - pay me!
February 8, 2022 at 2:08 pm
(This post was last modified: February 8, 2022 at 4:08 pm by John 6IX Breezy.)
(February 8, 2022 at 1:59 pm)Anomalocaris Wrote: no, interpretation is what allows the model to be built. the model actually test whether the interpretation is faithful enough to the original to the extent modeled. it doesn’t do interpretation.
That makes sense; I can see that being the case from a physicist's point of view.
(A psychologist would look at a physical model as an extension of our mental representations. In other words, both are the thing that does the interpreting. To illustrate, I was told an anecdote once about Richard Feynman, in which someone found his notes when developing Feynman Diagrams. The person remarked how they wish they could see how his mind worked. And Feynman responded that the notes were his work—that his thinking occurred on the page.)
