Ron Paul ignored.

[Anymouse]

Fox News, despite their claims, has an agenda, and that agenda does not include reporting on Rep. Dr. Paul, regardless of any ideas he might have.

That agenda fits in with their claim they report "the other side of the news the 'liberal' media ignores," which actually is a tacit admission of a few things:

1) They are biased.
2) They believe news issues only have two sides.
4) They have an agenda.
3) I skipped three.

Note they are studiously avoiding the UK phone hacking/computer hacking scandal as well. While they haven't said (because they haven't reported on it much at all), I suspect it is because their parent company (News Corp_ is in real danger of being charged of violating the corruption of foreign officials act.

I don't think the "liberal media" (which I understand to be any media not controlled by News Corp., whether they are biased or not) has ever been accused of such a breach of the law to report "the (only) other side of the story."

But because of the position Fox has (apparently) taken on Mr. Paul, should he be successful in running all the hazards in his way and win the presidential election against President Obama, Fox will have a new person to bully instead of Mr. Obama. It would be almost obligated to bully Paul, as they have spent so much effort to ignore him.