evolution

[Angrboda]

I have no problem with you suggesting that these things are in A. But you stated that there's no credible debate about things in A having evolutionary advantage. That requires, at minimum, that something relevant actually is in A. You can suggest all the doo-dah day long for all I care. That's not what this discussion is about. I don't have to demonstrate that nothing is in A to observe that you haven't demonstrated that any relevant thing actually is in A. We're talking facts, not speculation, conjecture, or suggestions. Since "it seems" doesn't even pass the smell test, do you have anything of actual substance to offer in defense of your proposition?