RE: Lab RNA molecule that replicates, diversifies, and develops complexity
March 20, 2022 at 12:55 am
(This post was last modified: March 20, 2022 at 12:58 am by Anomalocaris.)
(March 20, 2022 at 12:14 am)vulcanlogician Wrote:(March 19, 2022 at 10:20 pm)snowtracks Wrote: "Abiogenesis never really was needed to win that argument".
That's because after infinity was transversed, energy and matter decided to combine and the first thing that was decided was they would develop a brain so they could think. Okay, let’s go with that thought.
I WISH that creationism was so developed a theory that you had to demonstrate brain formation to refute it. Sadly, no.
All you gotta do is prove that the universe is more than 6,000 years old. Creationism is a horrible, horrible theory. Proven false independently in the fields of geology, biology, and astronomy.
It's kind of like someone having a theory that marshmallows are not affected by gravity. You don't have to have in-depth knowledge of how gravity works or how marshmallows are made to prove the theory false. All you gotta do is drop a marshmallow on the floor.
Creationism is as far from theory as any proposition can be.
A theory must reflect the intellectual capacity to know what would constitute its defeat, coupled with the intellectual honesty to tell its challengers what would constitute its defeat.
missing one and it no longer qualify as a theory. Missing both and it is acquires the sort of intellectual worthlessness that characterizes “faith”
