Well I think I just proved you are by the fact that a copyleft license does not restrict you from selling your product.
I mean just think about it. A person can buy a song (not theft) and then distribute it for free. You could argue that the people receiving the file are stealing, but the person who is distributing is not; he is breaking copyright.
This is why the record companies aim for the people who break the copyright (the filesharers), because they are causing the problem.
Under a copyleft license, a person still has to purchase the copy (otherwise it would be theft), but once they have it they can modify and distribute it (often selling it on again since they need to actually make a profit).
I mean just think about it. A person can buy a song (not theft) and then distribute it for free. You could argue that the people receiving the file are stealing, but the person who is distributing is not; he is breaking copyright.
This is why the record companies aim for the people who break the copyright (the filesharers), because they are causing the problem.
Under a copyleft license, a person still has to purchase the copy (otherwise it would be theft), but once they have it they can modify and distribute it (often selling it on again since they need to actually make a profit).
