RE: Head binding now and the past
May 20, 2022 at 8:49 am
(This post was last modified: May 20, 2022 at 10:46 am by highdimensionman.)
I think you can get a worm or something to grow with 2 head sections but you have to do a lot of damage. It all depends how the dna you pass on is maintained and how sperm and eggs are replenished. If you can break an organisms stabilising regenerative means in such a way that effects the sperm or the egg then there is an effect on the next generation.
Imagine say you have an orchestra. They all roughly know what the other is doing. In order to stop that orchestra from rebuilding after lost personnel and playing there main theme tune you would have to remove quite a lot of personal. you have to do quite a lot of damage before a new orchestra is formed from agents of 2 orchestras in order to continue the damage impact (the cutting the tail issue). However this does not mean the orchestra can't play a slightly different theme after a long process of trying to help the members to play something more tweaked over generations of new orchestra's (the generational head binding issue). The problem is with analysis it's near impossible to prove that external tweaking played a role given the dominance of new orchestra selection on the process. This doesn't mean a cell can't learn new tricks or that self development does not play a role in evolution it's just more complex and subtle to prove.
Imagine say you have an orchestra. They all roughly know what the other is doing. In order to stop that orchestra from rebuilding after lost personnel and playing there main theme tune you would have to remove quite a lot of personal. you have to do quite a lot of damage before a new orchestra is formed from agents of 2 orchestras in order to continue the damage impact (the cutting the tail issue). However this does not mean the orchestra can't play a slightly different theme after a long process of trying to help the members to play something more tweaked over generations of new orchestra's (the generational head binding issue). The problem is with analysis it's near impossible to prove that external tweaking played a role given the dominance of new orchestra selection on the process. This doesn't mean a cell can't learn new tricks or that self development does not play a role in evolution it's just more complex and subtle to prove.
