[Serious] Fallacies & Strategies

[Deesse23]

A god who intervenes in the world may intervene simply by means of natural laws, and a naturalist will obviously be content with these as the final explanation.

And he's essentially saying his god is indistinguishable from the natural laws. So why bother proposing a god, to begin with? Why put an extra unneeded entity. ?God is no final explanation he's a needless addition to the explanation. And what a fine excuse I no grand miracles are forth cloaked god in the mundane....How very convenient for the theist......

Natural laws! So why bother proposing a god!? Yeah, really, why?


You (Kloro) know what claiming that "Natural laws, therefore god" is? A fallacy. This is as close as "Look at the trees" as it gets.

Considering that most theists´posts in this thread are a big ole "I dont have anyting to bring to the table, so i just claim everyone to be stupid who believes different than me", "look at the trees" is really, really, quite an achievement.