Quote:ck on the second page of this thread, Neo said that it was a category error to speak of the God of classical theism as if it were an entity, like the Tooth Fairy or Santa Claus.Yup and it's not a category error Neo is simply wrong and nothing you listed here changes that and Edward Feser is a hack and a huckster
There are fundamental differences. For example, Santa Claus, if he existed, would have parts (feet and hands, for example) and would move around (delivering presents). But these are not characteristics of the God of classical theism.
I don't expect that anyone is much interested in learning about the thing they're arguing against. Still, in case anyone would like to know more, Edward Feser's blog describes this in a readable way
"Change was inevitable"
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
![[Image: Canada_Flag.jpg?v=1646203843]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=cdn.shopify.com%2Fs%2Ffiles%2F1%2F0630%2F5310%2F3332%2Fproducts%2FCanada_Flag.jpg%3Fv%3D1646203843)
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
