(June 16, 2022 at 9:12 pm)bennyboy Wrote: Not if the opponent's terms are themselves dishonest.
I'm perfectly capable of detailing a pro-lifer's argument in their terms. However, since pro-lifers' terms are, in my estimation, couched to bypass rational argument rather than to engage in it, then accepting them at face value means either carrying on a farcical debate, or choosing not to have one at all.
I guess we've heard different arguments.