RE: Van Tillian/Clarkian Presuppositional Apologetics.
December 2, 2011 at 8:00 pm
(This post was last modified: December 2, 2011 at 8:04 pm by Statler Waldorf.)
(November 23, 2011 at 4:46 pm)Rhythm Wrote: Is it 50 pages of "specific cases" yet? Shize, nope, still 49. So, before we continue, are you being serious or just arguing for the sake of argument? Because I don't want to waste my time.
Let me ask you something, does the phrase "you cannot account for" ring a bell to you?
So you can’t point to a specific case? I didn’t think you could. At least I finally found a way to deal with you, call you on your B.S., and then move on when you can’t back it up.
(November 23, 2011 at 7:38 pm)DeistPaladin Wrote: I know I'm done. I got a new signature quote out of all this so it's not a complete loss.
I find it interesting how you run away every time I have you pinned in a corner on something; you would have had to say, “The standard of a meter stick is a meter because it is a meter by definition.” This of course would be the same argument I used for the goodness of God that you thought was somehow logically fallacious. So I will tally that as a win for me because I made you use the exact same argument you said I couldn’t use which of course would be special pleading.
Did you also miss the fact I cited sources stating that circular reasoning was not in fact logically invalid? Did you also miss the fact that I forced you to also use circular reasoning when it came to the use of human reason and the length of a meter? I get so tired of having to teach you the basics of logical reasoning for free; I need to start charging a fee.
