(September 28, 2022 at 2:45 am)Deesse23 Wrote:(September 27, 2022 at 5:20 pm)Jehanne Wrote: And, so, when Ukraine wins and joins NATO, no issues then with nuclear weapons being in Ukraine? Russia should just accept that??There is a certain area of grey between accepting something and invading another country, dont you think?
How about if the United States should build ICBMs in Taiwan? Should China just accept that?
Plus: Whom is NATO threatening? Did you ever bother to read the paragraphs of the treaty? NATO is simply unable to threaten anyone, since it is a defensive alliance, with everyone responding as soon as someone is attacked.
NATO is only a threat to you if you intend to threaten (or even start one) war with one of its members, but dont wanna deal with the rest.....oh, wait
Oh, I agree, and so, no objections if Russia would decide to locate a thousand ICBMs in Cuba?? How about if they decide to abandon the START I & II treaties and build up their nuclear stockpiles to 50 or 60K of hydrogen bombs? What if they construct a set of dozens of nuclear launch platforms in international waters a few hundred miles off the coasts of the United States??
Your logic is that whatever NATO does is okay, as long as they do not fire the first savo; of course, no military analyst or commander in NATO thinks this way.
