(December 8, 2022 at 10:22 pm)Dio Wrote:(December 8, 2022 at 8:57 pm)Rev. Rye Wrote: I don’t know, but if James O’Keefe’s past work is any indication, you can’t trust him to accurately tell the truth in his “exposes” any more than you can expect Kaitlin Bennett to be housebroken.
Note: there’s also a part 4, but we have a rule against posting more than 3 videos in a single post.
Four hours of video and there's more?
I would concede that it's an edited interview, I don't see any context that would somehow mitigate the unbroken sentences that readily admit to using sex toys as educational material. The obvious context is queer pedagogy but no one is going to say the quiet part out loud, hence the purpose of undercover tactics.
Why would you need to deceptively edit an interview when your goal is to expose wrongdoing? The interview should be able to speak for itself without taking anything out of context.
I'm not anti-Christian. I'm anti-stupid.