Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: August 15, 2025, 7:34 am
Atheist Forums › Community › Religion › Christianity v
The historical Jesus--dead wrong, literally.

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Thread Modes
The historical Jesus--dead wrong, literally.
Barre Offline
Newbie
*
Religious Views: Pantheist
Posts: 60
Threads: 13
Joined: September 21, 2011
Reputation: 0
#9
RE: The historical Jesus--dead wrong, literally.
December 7, 2011 at 7:44 pm
(December 7, 2011 at 1:47 am)Minimalist Wrote:
Quote:I am interpreting the verb in the sense that the high priest will [soon] see the inauguration of the Messianic Age as proof that he is the Messiah.


Yes, early xtians had a problem with that too when it didn't happen. A little fancy footwork was necessary to get their godboy off the hook.

Yes, I agree with you that early Christianity exhibits "Bad Faith." Do you think I have correctly interpreted, "you shall [soon] see."
Find
Reply


Atheist Forums › Community › Religion › Christianity v
The historical Jesus--dead wrong, literally.

Messages In This Thread
The historical Jesus--dead wrong, literally. - by Barre - December 7, 2011 at 1:20 am
RE: The historical Jesus--dead wrong, literally. - by Barre - December 7, 2011 at 7:38 pm
RE: The historical Jesus--dead wrong, literally. - by Barre - December 7, 2011 at 7:57 pm
RE: The historical Jesus--dead wrong, literally. - by Barre - December 7, 2011 at 7:44 pm
RE: The historical Jesus--dead wrong, literally. - by Barre - December 7, 2011 at 9:17 pm
RE: The historical Jesus--dead wrong, literally. - by Barre - December 14, 2011 at 4:01 am
RE: The historical Jesus--dead wrong, literally. - by Barre - January 6, 2012 at 12:38 pm
RE: The historical Jesus--dead wrong, literally. - by Barre - January 22, 2012 at 8:57 pm
RE: The historical Jesus--dead wrong, literally. - by Barre - December 19, 2011 at 7:37 am
RE: The historical Jesus--dead wrong, literally. - by Barre - December 26, 2011 at 2:57 am
RE: The historical Jesus--dead wrong, literally. - by Barre - December 7, 2011 at 8:14 pm
RE: The historical Jesus--dead wrong, literally. - by ThomM - December 7, 2011 at 7:59 pm
RE: The historical Jesus--dead wrong, literally. - by padraic - December 14, 2011 at 5:50 pm
RE: The historical Jesus--dead wrong, literally. - by Barre - January 22, 2012 at 7:29 pm
RE: The historical Jesus--dead wrong, literally. - by Phil - January 23, 2012 at 10:37 am
RE: The historical Jesus--dead wrong, literally. - by Barre - January 24, 2012 at 12:27 am

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  I literally cannot avoid sinning; so, why... zwanzig 70 9920 July 23, 2023 at 7:43 am
Last Post: no one
  Is this a contradiction or am I reading it wrong? Genesis 5:28 Ferrocyanide 110 24441 April 10, 2023 at 3:32 pm
Last Post: Ferrocyanide
  Question to theists: When to take the bible literally? T.J. 22 3273 November 26, 2021 at 6:14 pm
Last Post: onlinebiker
  They're going to be chanting to the wrong God. brewer 32 4825 March 17, 2021 at 2:39 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Theism is literally childish I_am_not_mafia 391 90221 November 16, 2017 at 6:28 pm
Last Post: Amarok
  Jesus did not rise from the dead -- My debate opening statement. Jehanne 155 38022 January 21, 2017 at 1:28 am
Last Post: Wyrd of Gawd
  The Historical Reliability of the New Testament Randy Carson 706 172702 June 9, 2015 at 12:04 pm
Last Post: downbeatplumb
  Historical Easter Question for Minimalist thesummerqueen 26 9631 April 5, 2015 at 3:47 pm
Last Post: Minimalist
Exclamation Jesus is Dead Cinjin 73 19803 February 12, 2015 at 3:49 pm
Last Post: robvalue
  In Christianity, Does Jesus' Soul Have Anything To Do With Why Jesus Is God? JesusIsGod7 18 8620 October 7, 2014 at 12:58 pm
Last Post: JesusHChrist



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)