Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 12, 2024, 6:53 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Subsequent truths
RE: Subsequent truths
(November 10, 2011 at 9:07 am)chadster1976 Wrote: As a Christian, I am constantly amazed by how often I am told I am not a true believer BY OTHER CHRISTIANS!!!

Now, just historically, the Roman Catholic Church is probably the oldest Christian denomination there is and is the largest. It also holds scriptures in original languages and relies on the older texts to form its doctrines. You would therefore assume that it is closest to the church set up by Jesus. Right? Well not according to some. Many YEC's rely on 20th century translations of the Bible that have slightly differing translations and are annotated in such a ways as to guide away from traditional interpretation.

Where does it state in the original Greek text of Genesis that the 6 days of creation were distinct 24 hour periods? It doesn't.

Sorry - but a day is a day

IT is claimed that the bible was the inspired word of a god - which we now know to be nonsense - but lets run with that claim

IF a god did inspire the bible - and was all knowing -as claimed - and there is ONLY ONE GOD doing the inspiration as claimed -then the "day" word would have to mean the same thing throughout the bible and throughout other jewish scripture as well. WHen the bible was first written - in about 450 bce - the "day" was well known for jews - as being the time between Sundown - and the next Sundown. A claim that it would mean a period of time different from that - does not follow with ALL of the other uses for the word in the fairy tales. Sorry - YOUR inference fails logically

So - UNLESS you are attempting to say that the chirst was in the ground for a VERY LONG TIME (whatever the time you claim creation took) - your claim makes NO sense

(November 10, 2011 at 9:07 am)chadster1976 Wrote: As a Christian, I am constantly amazed by how often I am told I am not a true believer BY OTHER CHRISTIANS!!!

Now, just historically, the Roman Catholic Church is probably the oldest Christian denomination there is and is the largest. It also holds scriptures in original languages and relies on the older texts to form its doctrines. You would therefore assume that it is closest to the church set up by Jesus. Right? Well not according to some. Many YEC's rely on 20th century translations of the Bible that have slightly differing translations and are annotated in such a ways as to guide away from traditional interpretation.

Where does it state in the original Greek text of Genesis that the 6 days of creation were distinct 24 hour periods? It doesn't.

Sorry - but a day is a day

IT is claimed that the bible was the inspired word of a god - which we now know to be nonsense - but lets run with that claim

IF a god did inspire the bible - and was all knowing -as claimed - and there is ONLY ONE GOD doing the inspiration as claimed -then the "day" word would have to mean the same thing throughout the bible and throughout other jewish scripture as well. WHen the bible was first written - in about 450 bce - the "day" was well known for jews - as being the time between Sundown - and the next Sundown. A claim that it would mean a period of time different from that - does not follow with ALL of the other uses for the word in the fairy tales. Sorry - YOUR inference fails logically

So - UNLESS you are attempting to say that the chirst was in the ground for a VERY LONG TIME (whatever the time you claim creation took) - your claim makes NO sense





Where does it state in the original Greek text of Genesis that the 6 days of creation were distinct 24 hour periods?

A day is a day.

If - as claimed - the bible is actually the word of a monotheistic god who is all knowing - then IT would would have to use a consistent meaning for any particular word

Since the word "day" is used all over the bible - it cannot be claimed to mean all sorts of different things. For example- if you claim that creation took a time period other than days - that time period would apply to the christ in the ground as well.
Reply



Messages In This Thread
Subsequent truths - by chadster1976 - November 10, 2011 at 9:07 am
RE: Subsequent truths - by Zen Badger - November 10, 2011 at 9:15 am
RE: Subsequent truths - by Voltair - November 10, 2011 at 9:16 am
RE: Subsequent truths - by chadster1976 - November 10, 2011 at 9:22 am
RE: Subsequent truths - by frankiej - November 10, 2011 at 11:41 am
RE: Subsequent truths - by MysticKnight - November 24, 2011 at 9:23 pm
RE: Subsequent truths - by IATIA - November 25, 2011 at 7:27 pm
RE: Subsequent truths - by Kayenneh - November 10, 2011 at 9:22 am
RE: Subsequent truths - by The Grand Nudger - November 10, 2011 at 9:51 am
RE: Subsequent truths - by chadster1976 - November 10, 2011 at 11:58 am
RE: Subsequent truths - by fr0d0 - November 10, 2011 at 4:18 pm
RE: Subsequent truths - by chadster1976 - November 10, 2011 at 4:33 pm
RE: Subsequent truths - by The Grand Nudger - November 10, 2011 at 4:37 pm
RE: Subsequent truths - by Godschild - November 11, 2011 at 3:17 am
RE: Subsequent truths - by Erinome - November 11, 2011 at 7:44 pm
RE: Subsequent truths - by fr0d0 - November 11, 2011 at 4:05 am
RE: Subsequent truths - by chadster1976 - November 11, 2011 at 6:26 am
RE: Subsequent truths - by fr0d0 - November 11, 2011 at 9:04 am
RE: Subsequent truths - by Godschild - November 11, 2011 at 2:38 pm
RE: Subsequent truths - by ib.me.ub - November 11, 2011 at 6:31 am
RE: Subsequent truths - by chadster1976 - November 11, 2011 at 7:34 am
RE: Subsequent truths - by KichigaiNeko - November 11, 2011 at 8:50 am
RE: Subsequent truths - by The Grand Nudger - November 11, 2011 at 9:44 am
RE: Subsequent truths - by The Grand Nudger - November 11, 2011 at 2:55 pm
RE: Subsequent truths - by Godschild - November 11, 2011 at 7:31 pm
RE: Subsequent truths - by chadster1976 - November 12, 2011 at 6:49 am
RE: Subsequent truths - by Voltair - November 13, 2011 at 1:04 pm
RE: Subsequent truths - by Godschild - November 13, 2011 at 3:30 pm
RE: Subsequent truths - by 5thHorseman - November 13, 2011 at 3:51 pm
RE: Subsequent truths - by chadster1976 - November 13, 2011 at 5:25 pm
RE: Subsequent truths - by Godschild - November 14, 2011 at 4:52 pm
RE: Subsequent truths - by The Grand Nudger - November 13, 2011 at 5:26 pm
RE: Subsequent truths - by LastPoet - November 14, 2011 at 4:33 am
RE: Subsequent truths - by Justtristo - November 14, 2011 at 8:14 am
RE: Subsequent truths - by Faith No More - November 14, 2011 at 4:59 pm
RE: Subsequent truths - by The Grand Nudger - November 14, 2011 at 5:03 pm
RE: Subsequent truths - by 5thHorseman - November 14, 2011 at 5:04 pm
RE: Subsequent truths - by chadster1976 - November 14, 2011 at 8:48 pm
RE: Subsequent truths - by Godschild - November 15, 2011 at 1:14 am
RE: Subsequent truths - by padraic - November 14, 2011 at 9:32 pm
RE: Subsequent truths - by KichigaiNeko - November 15, 2011 at 1:16 am
RE: Subsequent truths - by chadster1976 - November 15, 2011 at 3:00 pm
RE: Subsequent truths - by Godschild - November 15, 2011 at 3:21 pm
RE: Subsequent truths - by frankiej - November 15, 2011 at 3:23 pm
RE: Subsequent truths - by Godschild - November 15, 2011 at 9:48 pm
RE: Subsequent truths - by Norfolk And Chance - November 15, 2011 at 9:56 pm
RE: Subsequent truths - by padraic - November 15, 2011 at 5:47 pm
RE: Subsequent truths - by Godschild - November 15, 2011 at 9:58 pm
RE: Subsequent truths - by Erinome - November 15, 2011 at 9:54 pm
RE: Subsequent truths - by Minimalist - November 15, 2011 at 10:19 pm
RE: Subsequent truths - by Erinome - November 15, 2011 at 11:05 pm
RE: Subsequent truths - by Godschild - November 16, 2011 at 3:52 am
RE: Subsequent truths - by frankiej - November 16, 2011 at 9:12 pm
RE: Subsequent truths - by chadster1976 - November 16, 2011 at 8:51 pm
RE: Subsequent truths - by Godschild - November 17, 2011 at 4:35 pm
RE: Subsequent truths - by KichigaiNeko - November 16, 2011 at 11:10 pm
RE: Subsequent truths - by Minimalist - November 16, 2011 at 11:20 pm
RE: Subsequent truths - by Faith No More - November 17, 2011 at 3:59 am
RE: Subsequent truths - by fr0d0 - November 17, 2011 at 4:13 am
RE: Subsequent truths - by KichigaiNeko - November 17, 2011 at 10:00 am
RE: Subsequent truths - by The Grand Nudger - November 17, 2011 at 10:19 am
RE: Subsequent truths - by chadster1976 - November 17, 2011 at 1:35 pm
RE: Subsequent truths - by fr0d0 - November 17, 2011 at 5:40 pm
RE: Subsequent truths - by 5thHorseman - November 17, 2011 at 5:04 pm
RE: Subsequent truths - by Godschild - November 18, 2011 at 2:54 am
RE: Subsequent truths - by downbeatplumb - November 18, 2011 at 2:53 pm
RE: Subsequent truths - by Norfolk And Chance - November 19, 2011 at 10:31 am
RE: Subsequent truths - by Jackalope - November 19, 2011 at 10:37 pm
RE: Subsequent truths - by 5thHorseman - November 17, 2011 at 5:44 pm
RE: Subsequent truths - by ElDinero - November 18, 2011 at 4:20 am
RE: Subsequent truths - by Godschild - November 21, 2011 at 12:00 am
RE: Subsequent truths - by Erinome - November 21, 2011 at 12:49 am
RE: Subsequent truths - by Godschild - November 21, 2011 at 6:34 pm
RE: Subsequent truths - by Norfolk And Chance - November 21, 2011 at 6:53 pm
RE: Subsequent truths - by Godschild - November 21, 2011 at 7:47 pm
RE: Subsequent truths - by Norfolk And Chance - November 21, 2011 at 9:56 pm
RE: Subsequent truths - by Godschild - November 23, 2011 at 12:33 am
RE: Subsequent truths - by IATIA - November 23, 2011 at 1:19 am
RE: Subsequent truths - by Erinome - November 22, 2011 at 7:19 am
RE: Subsequent truths - by Godschild - November 22, 2011 at 11:24 pm
RE: Subsequent truths - by IATIA - November 22, 2011 at 11:55 pm
RE: Subsequent truths - by Erinome - November 21, 2011 at 7:09 pm
RE: Subsequent truths - by ElDinero - November 21, 2011 at 7:40 pm
RE: Subsequent truths - by Norfolk And Chance - November 22, 2011 at 4:23 pm
RE: Subsequent truths - by ElDinero - November 21, 2011 at 2:57 am
RE: Subsequent truths - by downbeatplumb - November 21, 2011 at 12:43 pm
RE: Subsequent truths - by The Grand Nudger - November 18, 2011 at 3:23 pm
RE: Subsequent truths - by IATIA - November 18, 2011 at 4:11 pm
RE: Subsequent truths - by Erinome - November 18, 2011 at 6:05 pm
RE: Subsequent truths - by Minimalist - November 18, 2011 at 6:13 pm
RE: Subsequent truths - by Erinome - November 18, 2011 at 6:18 pm
RE: Subsequent truths - by Minimalist - November 18, 2011 at 8:04 pm
RE: Subsequent truths - by Erinome - November 18, 2011 at 8:25 pm
RE: Subsequent truths - by chadster1976 - November 20, 2011 at 7:24 am
RE: Subsequent truths - by Norfolk And Chance - November 20, 2011 at 7:43 am
RE: Subsequent truths - by Milky Tea - November 20, 2011 at 8:25 am
RE: Subsequent truths - by chadster1976 - November 20, 2011 at 9:16 am
RE: Subsequent truths - by Norfolk And Chance - November 20, 2011 at 9:31 am
RE: Subsequent truths - by downbeatplumb - November 20, 2011 at 10:11 am
RE: Subsequent truths - by chadster1976 - November 20, 2011 at 10:28 am
RE: Subsequent truths - by Norfolk And Chance - November 20, 2011 at 10:45 am
RE: Subsequent truths - by chadster1976 - November 20, 2011 at 10:54 am
RE: Subsequent truths - by The Grand Nudger - November 20, 2011 at 11:03 am
RE: Subsequent truths - by downbeatplumb - November 20, 2011 at 11:17 am
RE: Subsequent truths - by The Grand Nudger - November 20, 2011 at 11:45 am
RE: Subsequent truths - by chadster1976 - November 20, 2011 at 12:13 pm
RE: Subsequent truths - by IATIA - November 20, 2011 at 12:25 pm
RE: Subsequent truths - by The Grand Nudger - November 20, 2011 at 12:17 pm
RE: Subsequent truths - by chadster1976 - November 20, 2011 at 12:48 pm
RE: Subsequent truths - by Norfolk And Chance - November 20, 2011 at 12:57 pm
RE: Subsequent truths - by chadster1976 - November 20, 2011 at 1:09 pm
RE: Subsequent truths - by Norfolk And Chance - November 20, 2011 at 1:19 pm
RE: Subsequent truths - by chadster1976 - November 20, 2011 at 1:22 pm
RE: Subsequent truths - by Norfolk And Chance - November 20, 2011 at 1:26 pm
RE: Subsequent truths - by chadster1976 - November 20, 2011 at 1:36 pm
RE: Subsequent truths - by Norfolk And Chance - November 20, 2011 at 1:50 pm
RE: Subsequent truths - by Godschild - November 20, 2011 at 11:21 pm
RE: Subsequent truths - by IATIA - November 20, 2011 at 11:43 pm
RE: Subsequent truths - by Godschild - November 21, 2011 at 5:59 pm
RE: Subsequent truths - by Jackalope - November 21, 2011 at 6:28 pm
RE: Subsequent truths - by fr0d0 - November 20, 2011 at 2:52 pm
RE: Subsequent truths - by Norfolk And Chance - November 20, 2011 at 5:25 pm
RE: Subsequent truths - by Faith No More - November 20, 2011 at 5:49 pm
RE: Subsequent truths - by Norfolk And Chance - November 20, 2011 at 5:53 pm
RE: Subsequent truths - by fr0d0 - November 21, 2011 at 4:03 am
RE: Subsequent truths - by IATIA - November 20, 2011 at 5:53 pm
RE: Subsequent truths - by Phaedra - November 21, 2011 at 3:46 am
RE: Subsequent truths - by ElDinero - November 20, 2011 at 10:33 pm
RE: Subsequent truths - by 5thHorseman - November 21, 2011 at 3:57 am
RE: Subsequent truths - by Phaedra - November 21, 2011 at 4:02 am
RE: Subsequent truths - by Norfolk And Chance - November 21, 2011 at 6:09 am
RE: Subsequent truths - by chadster1976 - November 21, 2011 at 12:13 pm
RE: Subsequent truths - by Norfolk And Chance - November 21, 2011 at 1:12 pm
RE: Subsequent truths - by IATIA - November 21, 2011 at 12:25 pm
RE: Subsequent truths - by 5thHorseman - November 21, 2011 at 1:08 pm
RE: Subsequent truths - by Erinome - November 21, 2011 at 1:10 pm
RE: Subsequent truths - by Minimalist - November 21, 2011 at 1:13 pm
RE: Subsequent truths - by 5thHorseman - November 21, 2011 at 1:17 pm
RE: Subsequent truths - by Minimalist - November 21, 2011 at 1:22 pm
RE: Subsequent truths - by LastPoet - November 21, 2011 at 1:34 pm
RE: Subsequent truths - by chadster1976 - November 21, 2011 at 4:19 pm
RE: Subsequent truths - by Norfolk And Chance - November 21, 2011 at 4:52 pm
RE: Subsequent truths - by Norfolk And Chance - November 21, 2011 at 6:18 pm
RE: Subsequent truths - by Epimethean - November 22, 2011 at 7:57 am
RE: Subsequent truths - by The Grand Nudger - November 22, 2011 at 9:10 am
RE: Subsequent truths - by chadster1976 - November 22, 2011 at 11:32 am
RE: Subsequent truths - by Epimethean - November 23, 2011 at 1:08 am
RE: Subsequent truths - by Godschild - November 23, 2011 at 4:16 pm
RE: Subsequent truths - by The Grand Nudger - November 23, 2011 at 4:22 pm
RE: Subsequent truths - by Epimethean - November 23, 2011 at 5:11 pm
RE: Subsequent truths - by downbeatplumb - November 24, 2011 at 3:52 pm
RE: Subsequent truths - by The Grand Nudger - November 24, 2011 at 8:59 pm
RE: Subsequent truths - by The Grand Nudger - November 24, 2011 at 9:25 pm
RE: Subsequent truths - by downbeatplumb - November 25, 2011 at 12:19 pm
RE: Subsequent truths - by ThomM - December 7, 2011 at 8:16 pm
RE: Subsequent truths - by Epimethean - December 7, 2011 at 11:43 pm
RE: Subsequent truths - by thesummerqueen - December 7, 2011 at 11:49 pm



Users browsing this thread: 16 Guest(s)