(January 29, 2023 at 11:30 pm)Fake Messiah Wrote:(January 29, 2023 at 4:35 pm)Justin Case Wrote: As I said ... "There are people in this position who have not gone down the "evil" route, and this video is the best example." He's a scientist ... he had a good upbringing ... he's not "evil" ... but, like all non-empathics, if you know what you are looking for - they're REALLY easy to spot.
Yeah, people with a good upbringing usually don't choose a life of crime (evil), even psychopaths, like this woman.
If I had followed the genetics in my family, I'd be on that "evil" list too ... but fortunately I don't have that problem. My mother was a violent narcissist, and believe me life with her was a mess. If I had turned out like her, me and my brothers would probably be on the wanted list LOL.
But getting back to the original idea of this thread ... since writing began, all bad / evil in the world (including everyday things like storms) were all linked to the negative spiritual world as a source. Today we know differently. This is the difference between thinking and guessing, and then passing on this unverified "information" as truth. From here we enter the picture via the difference between classical teaching and constructivism. The religious elite "guessed" and this information could not be looked into by the common people, so classical teaching (here's the answers - just remember what I'm telling you) was the approach. Today we have the information for this topic via brain scans and medical studies, and now constructivism (YOU look for the answers) has replaced the classical teaching method.
Regarding "atheism" ... I wonder how things would go if historical hard data was used to figure out the answer?
"...and I saw clearly that men are not so far from the truth as they generally believe. Their greatest error is in searching for it where it is not, and in attaching it to forms, whereas they ought, on the contrary, to avoid form in order to dwell upon the essence."
Fabre D'Olivet
Fabre D'Olivet
