(March 22, 2023 at 2:33 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote:(March 22, 2023 at 1:43 pm)FlatAssembler Wrote: My point is that p-values are science. A paper which calculates p-values, like my paper, is scientific, even if it is wrong. A paper that doesn't calculate p-values is not scientific.
So, it’s better to be scientifically wrong than non-scientifically right?
Cool.
Boru
Since "non-scientifically right" means "accidentally right", yes. Don't you agree?