(March 28, 2023 at 5:48 pm)FlatAssembler Wrote:(March 28, 2023 at 1:12 pm)The Grand Nudger Wrote: B mine...and, exactly. There's nothing to explain to you which hasn't already been explained, from specifics to principals to generalities, and yet you remain wholly and completely oblivious.
I don't understand, if my paper about applying informatics to the names of places is so obviously wrong that even you can see that, why did it get published in two peer-reviewed journals? Why did a PhD linguist ask me to send her a copy? Why didn't two PhD informaticians whom I sent a manuscript of my paper find an error in my reasoning? Why did quite a few people who know something about informatics, including a PhD statistician teaching computer science, also say my arguments seem good to them? Why did my communicology professor tell me my arguments look good to him? It's clearly not Flat-Earth level wrongness, that anybody who is remotely related to the field can explain you why it's wrong.
The better question is why are you here asking these things?
This is not your personal forum for whatever thoughts bounce around your head. You are the only one interested in the things you go on and on about.
Find a forum that is geared towards the topics you want to obsess over...if such a thing exists.
I'm your huckleberry.
