(May 7, 2023 at 9:40 pm)The Grand Nudger Wrote: Personally, I read it as an internal dispute over blame for the failures of the war thusfar. Let's imagine that russia, againts all odds, wins something in ukraine. Someone will still need to be responsible for all that was lost. Can't be putin. Even in the dreamland putin regime change scenario..it still wouldn't be putin. There's no money shot until all gains, real or imagined, are solidified under a singular cult of personality...... and all loss is offloaded onto another.But... But ...Pentagon papers...
Because those are the final gospel on the outcome of the war
"Change was inevitable"
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
![[Image: Canada_Flag.jpg?v=1646203843]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=cdn.shopify.com%2Fs%2Ffiles%2F1%2F0630%2F5310%2F3332%2Fproducts%2FCanada_Flag.jpg%3Fv%3D1646203843)
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
