Minimalist said: His "Case for Christ" has been refuted by Earl Doherty and Robert Price among others. As noted, the problem with it is that Stroebel interviews a bunch of apologist asswipes and writes their opinions down as if they are fact. There is no balance in the book and no hard evidence.
Namely The Case Against The Case For Christ by Robert Price, Challenging The Verdict: A Cross-Examination of Lee Strobel's "The Case For Christ by Earl Doherty. I actually tried to read Strobel's book but didn't make it out of the first chapter before I saw how biased it was so I decided to watch the painful one hour documentary based on the book of the same title. I've thoroughly read and examined the two books I mentioned above and find the case against Christ more compelling. I am one of those atheists that even questions the very historicity of Christ due to the lack of evidence of his existence but that is a different topic altogether.
Namely The Case Against The Case For Christ by Robert Price, Challenging The Verdict: A Cross-Examination of Lee Strobel's "The Case For Christ by Earl Doherty. I actually tried to read Strobel's book but didn't make it out of the first chapter before I saw how biased it was so I decided to watch the painful one hour documentary based on the book of the same title. I've thoroughly read and examined the two books I mentioned above and find the case against Christ more compelling. I am one of those atheists that even questions the very historicity of Christ due to the lack of evidence of his existence but that is a different topic altogether.
There is nothing people will not maintain when they are slaves to superstition
http://chatpilot-godisamyth.blogspot.com/
http://chatpilot-godisamyth.blogspot.com/
