(June 21, 2023 at 5:50 pm)Authari Wrote: Also the unborn child is not 'her body' that she gets to decide to do with as she wishes, it comes with its own set of organs and is capable of recognizing their mother's voice, yet you would have an unborn child that is capable of recognizing his mother's voice be thrown to the wolves with the abortion that many places allow where it is legal to have an abortion even a day before the expected mother was due to deliver. So to me more about how this individual being who is capable of recognizing his mother's voice does not have the protected rights of their person and their liberty?
Do you know at what stage of development the fetus is able to recognize its mother's voice? And if that is important, shouldn't abortions before that point be allowable? And if aborting fetuses before that point isn't allowable; then the capacity to recognize the voice of the mother is not relevant to your position, it's just a fallacious appeal to emotion.
I'm not anti-Christian. I'm anti-stupid.
