Titanic Sub Conspiracy Theories Spread Like Wildfire
"What if this is all a ploy to keep people from visiting the Titanic wreckage? If that's the goal, why?" Stew Peters, a right-wing commentator, asked on his eponymous talk show. "Maybe because if people explore the Titanic too much, they would discover that it wasn't an iceberg that sank the Titanic."
Peters spoke with Zach Vorhies, a former Google engineer who published an "expose" on the company in 2021 and who offered a conspiracy theory narrative to the Titan story in a Twitter thread on Thursday.
"The thing about this submarine which is really weird is that it was actually funded by the Rothschild dynasty," Vorhies told Peters. "And what's also really interesting is there is a new treaty that's getting implemented that makes it so that citizens... can't go visit there without a permit."
On Twitter, he pointed to conflicting accounts regarding the presence of an iceberg around the time the Titanic sank, and argued that an iceberg would not be able to cut through the ship's one-inch steel hull.
"I believe if people go down there, what they're going to find is that there isn't an implosion in the hull due to an iceberg," Vorhies said. "What they're going to find is an outward buckling of the hull because explosives were placed on the Titanic to blow it out."
Vorhies went on to explain that four industrialists opposed to the creation of the Federal Reserve had been on the ship and perished when it went down, describing the sinking as a "piece of sabotage" to "trojan horse" the creation of the central bank.
He speculated that those behind the conspiracy were "the current stockholders of the Federal Reserve" and claimed Titan's demise "will be used as leverage to make the Titanic off limits by visitation."
Meanwhile, another claimed that the Titan implosion was "a rerun" of the Titanic sinking, speculating that it was a prelude to a new gold-backed currency being announced.
https://www.newsweek.com/rothschild-link...ry-1808683
"What if this is all a ploy to keep people from visiting the Titanic wreckage? If that's the goal, why?" Stew Peters, a right-wing commentator, asked on his eponymous talk show. "Maybe because if people explore the Titanic too much, they would discover that it wasn't an iceberg that sank the Titanic."
Peters spoke with Zach Vorhies, a former Google engineer who published an "expose" on the company in 2021 and who offered a conspiracy theory narrative to the Titan story in a Twitter thread on Thursday.
"The thing about this submarine which is really weird is that it was actually funded by the Rothschild dynasty," Vorhies told Peters. "And what's also really interesting is there is a new treaty that's getting implemented that makes it so that citizens... can't go visit there without a permit."
On Twitter, he pointed to conflicting accounts regarding the presence of an iceberg around the time the Titanic sank, and argued that an iceberg would not be able to cut through the ship's one-inch steel hull.
"I believe if people go down there, what they're going to find is that there isn't an implosion in the hull due to an iceberg," Vorhies said. "What they're going to find is an outward buckling of the hull because explosives were placed on the Titanic to blow it out."
Vorhies went on to explain that four industrialists opposed to the creation of the Federal Reserve had been on the ship and perished when it went down, describing the sinking as a "piece of sabotage" to "trojan horse" the creation of the central bank.
He speculated that those behind the conspiracy were "the current stockholders of the Federal Reserve" and claimed Titan's demise "will be used as leverage to make the Titanic off limits by visitation."
Meanwhile, another claimed that the Titan implosion was "a rerun" of the Titanic sinking, speculating that it was a prelude to a new gold-backed currency being announced.
https://www.newsweek.com/rothschild-link...ry-1808683
teachings of the Bible are so muddled and self-contradictory that it was possible for Christians to happily burn heretics alive for five long centuries. It was even possible for the most venerated patriarchs of the Church, like St. Augustine and St. Thomas Aquinas, to conclude that heretics should be tortured (Augustine) or killed outright (Aquinas). Martin Luther and John Calvin advocated the wholesale murder of heretics, apostates, Jews, and witches. - Sam Harris, "Letter To A Christian Nation"