A Rebellious People

[The Architect Of Fate]

You made the assertion that infants do not have the RIGHT to live within the womb, ergo sir

And they do not there is nothing you have appealed to thus far that would grant them such an intrusive right.

 I want you to explain why the woman has more of a 'right' to end her child's life because of her own poor life decision.

Because the fetus exists in her body and the state of pregnancy is a function of her body as well as the act of sex. No one has the right to curtail her sexual freedoms nor any right to keep her in a state of pregnancy against her will. And nothing you have presented thus far can give such a prescription that it does.

 Prove to me that the infant does NOT HAVE THE RIGHT. 

Prove to me that it does. Give the prescription that gives it the right to live in someone else's body against will. You can't because it doesn't exist. Appealing to DNA won't do it. Appealing to anatomy won't do it. It's fiction.

And if you say its her body its not, the infant as I have proved has its own cognizance.

The fetus's ability to think is irrelevant to the fact it's living in her body and she has the right to expel it and no fact you can't point to says she doesn't.


Now keep waving your surrender flag



Meanwhile


The glorious Maple Leaf flies proudly!!!