(June 24, 2023 at 4:32 pm)Authari Wrote: You made the assertion that infants do not have the RIGHT to live within the womb, ergo sir, I want you to explain why the woman has more of a 'right' to end her child's life because of her own poor life decision. Prove to me that the infant does NOT HAVE THE RIGHT. And if you say its her body its not, the infant as I have proved has its own cognizance.
Fetus's have the right to live in a woman's womb, but NOT at the expense of the woman's rights.
No one has the right to order someone to act as a life support system for another person.
You anti-choice people don't want to give fetus's the same rights as a person already born, you want to give them special rights.
Let's say you wake up one day with a 4 year old person connected to your body for you to act as their life support system for 9 months. If you have them disconnected, it will absolutely end their life.
Should you be forced to continue to live with this other person using you for life support?
You'd believe if you just opened your heart" is a terrible argument for religion. It's basically saying, "If you bias yourself enough, you can convince yourself that this is true." If religion were true, people wouldn't need faith to believe it -- it would be supported by good evidence.
