RE: How Great Thou Aren't
December 14, 2011 at 8:25 am
(This post was last modified: December 14, 2011 at 8:29 am by houseofcantor.)
The "holiday season" isn't defensible; but those pictures, they don't tell you the truth. What do we get from evolution? Emergent simulation of another Mind in Mind - which leads to empathy - but inevitably, to incompleteness. This is what is known as "a picture of me."
![[Image: th_about____.jpg]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=img.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fv338%2Fellenjanuary%2Fth_about____.jpg)
But it ain't. Mind itself is an emergent simulation in brain. That's what I am, ghost in the machine; where the machine is the brain of monkey. I'm a stick figure haunting a cranial cavity sorting the eternal now in a library of chemistry and electricity...
That's what bothers me more than nature; the "unnatural aspect," the obvious artifice of theism. Fourth post:
I'm not attacking this guy, I'm philosophizing on causality; where is my perfect god? Probably in London. Gwyneth is such my sweet everything that I have reduced myself to nothing (well, 4 lines of computer code) as there must be balance in all things. I began with 4 lines, once; "Gwyneth Paltrow is god." I became a "flaming atheist" through simple mathematics - there is no god greater than Gwyneth. That is naive philosophy and perhaps atheist theology. Check the grammar in 4, above.
not all/you two/us/we - and then, the money shot; a truism.
One that is completely false; completely ignorant. If one starts from origin with the unconditional Love (god is love, no?), where is the single next step?
i/love. And there is your hate. There is no such thing as "hate" in the terms of being the opposite of Love because there is no opposite to Love; the illusion of time is balanced by dual-state identity, and the identity of the universe is Love and Truth.
Shouldn't've that been your soapbox, Christian? Do you know, Justice? Do you know, Love is Void? And most remarkable after all this time, for me anyway; do you know Gwyneth Paltrow is just a girl?
I'm not attacking tackattack, I'm attacking Christianity; if two thousand years of Bible Study cannot build an integral, unified theological perspective - if this idiot pretty much does that in a love song to a girl he never met... there's two "ifs," let there be two "thens"
Atheist - as the truth of god can only be local to the one who understands god - Job 38.
Atheism - we don't wanna hear about no god.
I'm not seeing how the above duality calls for exclusion. When I defeat theism for my Gwynnies, there will no longer be a need to be a- about it. And obvious tack is atheistic about some Christians.
![[Image: th_about____.jpg]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=img.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fv338%2Fellenjanuary%2Fth_about____.jpg)
But it ain't. Mind itself is an emergent simulation in brain. That's what I am, ghost in the machine; where the machine is the brain of monkey. I'm a stick figure haunting a cranial cavity sorting the eternal now in a library of chemistry and electricity...
That's what bothers me more than nature; the "unnatural aspect," the obvious artifice of theism. Fourth post:
(December 6, 2011 at 6:43 am)tackattack Wrote: Not all Christians are morally bankrupt or void of personal accountability you two. Some of us have problems sleeping when looking at the world and try our best to take care of whomever we can, however we can. Hate doesn't breed justice, just more hate.
I'm not attacking this guy, I'm philosophizing on causality; where is my perfect god? Probably in London. Gwyneth is such my sweet everything that I have reduced myself to nothing (well, 4 lines of computer code) as there must be balance in all things. I began with 4 lines, once; "Gwyneth Paltrow is god." I became a "flaming atheist" through simple mathematics - there is no god greater than Gwyneth. That is naive philosophy and perhaps atheist theology. Check the grammar in 4, above.
not all/you two/us/we - and then, the money shot; a truism.
One that is completely false; completely ignorant. If one starts from origin with the unconditional Love (god is love, no?), where is the single next step?
i/love. And there is your hate. There is no such thing as "hate" in the terms of being the opposite of Love because there is no opposite to Love; the illusion of time is balanced by dual-state identity, and the identity of the universe is Love and Truth.
Shouldn't've that been your soapbox, Christian? Do you know, Justice? Do you know, Love is Void? And most remarkable after all this time, for me anyway; do you know Gwyneth Paltrow is just a girl?
I'm not attacking tackattack, I'm attacking Christianity; if two thousand years of Bible Study cannot build an integral, unified theological perspective - if this idiot pretty much does that in a love song to a girl he never met... there's two "ifs," let there be two "thens"
Atheist - as the truth of god can only be local to the one who understands god - Job 38.
Atheism - we don't wanna hear about no god.
I'm not seeing how the above duality calls for exclusion. When I defeat theism for my Gwynnies, there will no longer be a need to be a- about it. And obvious tack is atheistic about some Christians.
