Names of places in Croatia

[BrianSoddingBoru4]

I don't have to compare them to shit.  Just like I don't have to listen to your bleating about ad hoc hypotheses.  You think that croation toponyms mean that the war never happened, war crimes weren't committed, and mass graves don't exist.

Deeply motivated reasoning lead you to pursue a hypothesis that contradicts documented history, after the fact.  You've been corrected at and on every point..as far as I can see, multiple times across multiple places.  You've had academics explain to you, in no uncertain terms, that your thoughts weren't worth their time - and now, after all of that - have decided that everyone else is engaged in ad hoc reasoning.  That reality itself must be conspiring against your truth.

And all those academics who found my arguments compelling count for nothing? Even Franjo Jović agreed with me that the p-value of that k-r pattern in the Croatian river names has to be between 1/300 and 1/17, he merely commented that he thinks it is closer to 1/17. And my other professor of informatics, Anđelko Lišnjić, had no objections to the content of my arguments, he merely had suggestions of how to present them better. And so did my Algorithms and Data Structures professor Alfonzo Baumgartner, he said that my paper seems very valuable to him. And my Computer Science professor, Tomislav Rudec, had no objections either to the arguments themselves or the way I presented them, he said that my paper is "an incredible connection between historical linguistics and probability theory". And my Computer Architecture professor Ivan Aleksi said "It looks good to me.". And my communicology professor Jerko Glavaš (a Herzegovinian by nationality, unrelated to the Croatian war criminal Branimir Glavaš who has the same surname) told me "Just continue that way.". All of that counts for nothing?

Everyone who agrees with you is right and everyone who disagrees with you is wrong? Do you see the issue here?

Boru