(July 21, 2023 at 5:00 pm)FlatAssembler Wrote:(July 21, 2023 at 4:28 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: It is NOT the same thing, not remotely. What is happening to you is that people are critiquing aspects of your paper and making suggestions. This is essentially an informal sort of peer review and is vital to scientific discourse.
Ad hoc would be if YOU kept adding new bits to your own theory every time it faced a criticism (to your credit, you haven’t done this).
Boru
Don't you think that, to an experiment, you should respond with an experiment, rather than with speculation? I made an actual experiment, and neuralbeans is responding with nothing but speculation.
No. Place names in Croatia is a trivial topic. It isn’t incumbent upon other people to try to replicate your results. This isn’t cold fusion, ffs.
Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
