RE: Abiogenesis ("Chemical Evolution"): Did Life come from Non-Life by Pure Chance.
July 26, 2023 at 4:32 am
(This post was last modified: July 26, 2023 at 4:34 am by The Architect Of Fate.)
Quote:You quote your Atheist websites, we'll quote our Christian websites, that's how this works. I've provided plenty of commentary of my own either summarizing the arguments made in the links or books I refer to, or developing them, or replying to objections made against them etc.You quote creationist garbage we quote actual science so no that's not how this works. All you have done is display your personal ignorance and no all you have done is mindlessly repeat creationist talking points.
Quote:The fact remains Spontaneous Abiogenesis is so exceedingly unlikely that it's more rational to infer the Formation of Intelligent Life came about through Intelligent Design rather than some chance combination of elements allegedly creating the first cell. Will provide more detail on this shortly.Nope, Abiogenesis is actual science and is completely likely, and intelligent design is bunk pseudoscience. And Abiogenesis didn't happen by chance that's and you will provide nothing that shows anything but your ignorance and embrace of pseudoscience.
"Change was inevitable"
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
![[Image: Canada_Flag.jpg?v=1646203843]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=cdn.shopify.com%2Fs%2Ffiles%2F1%2F0630%2F5310%2F3332%2Fproducts%2FCanada_Flag.jpg%3Fv%3D1646203843)
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
