Any Nihilists here?

[FrustratedFool]

I'm using grand there colloquially and rhetorically to distinguish value as an objective moral category from value as either a utility or a subjective moral value. Consistency is valuable for its utility. It's not valuable in any objective moral sense, because nothing is. Language is messy, and the customs of the morality language game will often lead to such messy or redundant phrasings. But that shouldn't take prececedence over clear statements of position, especially in a casual forum exchange.