Yes, you've said that. I've agreed, for the sake of argument that moral facts exist. Now I'm just querying the methodology of finding out what those facts are.
So, it's quite simple to devise a test to find out if cats exist or if there's one in the room or if they can fly and so on.
But what test can we devise to find out if causing harm is bad?
So, it's quite simple to devise a test to find out if cats exist or if there's one in the room or if they can fly and so on.
But what test can we devise to find out if causing harm is bad?