(August 24, 2023 at 6:19 am)The Grand Nudger Wrote: Well, for starters, it's unclear how we can deny a moral fact without at least calling into question any other mechanically similar fact or fact-alike utterance. It's likely, from my experience, that whatever justification we give for the acceptance of one class of facts will be the basis for my next purported moral fact. From the other end, it's quite a spectacle. I can sum the whole bit up in two lines.
Man, it's not like that!
-Man it's just like that.
I see statements about moral facts to be similiar in some ways to statements about God, and similiar in some ways to statements about cats, and different in some ways to statements about cats and God.