I am not trying to convince anyone. The argument is there. You can accept or reject it. It seems many have rejected it outright, and began to attack me. I havent seen a response (actually there was one person who actually responded a few pages back, which I appreciated) to my argument yet. You call me an apologetic, mince my words, attempt to catch me in some sort of "gotcha" moment, but all off that is irrelevant to the point I have made, which I will state again:
A belief in objective morality, that things have value, in the most simplistic sense that any belief held by anyone ever was inherently true, apart from the fact that it was a belief (gravity, electro magnetism, thermo-dynamics) asactual laws of the universe necessarily stems from a belief that consciousness is a primary function of the universe (like physics), think a unifying theory, That belief would correctly be described as a belief in a monotheistic diety. Atheism then necessarily denotes a belief that inherent truth and reality do not actually exist, and that all views and beliefs are purely subjective. atheism can not reconcile a belief in objective truth or reality with a belief that "God" (consciousness as a primary function of the universe) does not exist.
A belief in objective morality, that things have value, in the most simplistic sense that any belief held by anyone ever was inherently true, apart from the fact that it was a belief (gravity, electro magnetism, thermo-dynamics) asactual laws of the universe necessarily stems from a belief that consciousness is a primary function of the universe (like physics), think a unifying theory, That belief would correctly be described as a belief in a monotheistic diety. Atheism then necessarily denotes a belief that inherent truth and reality do not actually exist, and that all views and beliefs are purely subjective. atheism can not reconcile a belief in objective truth or reality with a belief that "God" (consciousness as a primary function of the universe) does not exist.