I was talking about you welsh cake. you were the one poster who actually honestly attacked my argument. You claim that the fundamental forces of nature have nothing to do mental concepts of morals, yet you admit that fundamental forces of nature produced conscious thought, and in fact everything in the universe... Logically those forces then do in fact form our notions of morality.
whether or not I have convinced anyone of my argument is irrelevant of truth. People can choose to accept or reject my argument for an infinate number of reasons, only one of which is that my argument isn't valid. I have not seen any one present a valid response negating my argument (you have attempted by claiming consciousness is not a primary function of the univerrse, which you can not prove), so I am forced to assume the rejection of it has nothing to do with it's validity but probably more to do with what people want to believe.
whether or not I have convinced anyone of my argument is irrelevant of truth. People can choose to accept or reject my argument for an infinate number of reasons, only one of which is that my argument isn't valid. I have not seen any one present a valid response negating my argument (you have attempted by claiming consciousness is not a primary function of the univerrse, which you can not prove), so I am forced to assume the rejection of it has nothing to do with it's validity but probably more to do with what people want to believe.
