RE: Argument against atheism
December 19, 2011 at 7:46 am
(This post was last modified: December 19, 2011 at 7:49 am by Welsh cake.)
(December 18, 2011 at 7:25 pm)amkerman Wrote: I was talking about you welsh cake. you were the one poster who actually honestly attacked my argument.A minute ago you claimed one person addressed your argument whereas many people attacked you and asked who? Now you're saying I'm the sole perpetrator for *addressing your argument* and not you as a person when in actuality many have refuted your claims? You are really starting to bore me.
Quote:You claim that the fundamental forces of nature have nothing to do mental concepts of morals, yet you admit that fundamental forces of nature produced conscious thought, and in fact everything in the universe... Logically those forces then do in fact form our notions of morality.Because one is specifically addressing what is biological, a by-product of brain electro-chemical signals that interpret information coming from our senses to allow us to interact with reality. The other is addressing fundamental interaction which is all to do with particle physics.
How elementary particles interact with one another says nothing about self awareness. That's no different than arguing that atoms themselves are alive and sentient. We are in a reality where its possible for life to arise from non-life, but you are asserting the end-result is responsible for the cause which is complete and utter nonsense and illogical. Consciousness can evolve but it is not the corner-stone of the cosmos as we know it, it is not a force. You are claiming that it is. Provide evidence for consciousness existing outside a mind. Kindly proceed to demonstrate how or stop wasting my time.