RE: Argument against atheism
December 19, 2011 at 10:48 am
(This post was last modified: December 19, 2011 at 10:57 am by amkerman.)
response to zen badger and darwinning:
We can not scientifically define God as God has never been scientifically evidenced in our world. There is no basis in the observable world to make a claim of what God is. Therefore, humanity is left to define God in terms of ideas and beliefs.
Since no definition of God is inherently correct or not correct, a belief in anything for which there is no empirical scientific evidence or data to support must necessarily stem from a belief in something that would most correctly be described as "God".
Since there is absolutely no empirical evidence to support the fact that anything is 100% true outside our own limited perceptions, any belief in objective reality or truth then necessarily stems from a belief in what humanity has decided to term "God".
That is why.
you would believe in flying kiwi's darwinning, that would be "God" to you if that's what you believed. There is no scientific definition of God. God has not been considered by science. Flying Kiwi's work, so do spaghetti monsters. Once you define and claim to know exactly what "God" is, however, you quickly lose all credibility.
im listening to it now summerequeen
We can not scientifically define God as God has never been scientifically evidenced in our world. There is no basis in the observable world to make a claim of what God is. Therefore, humanity is left to define God in terms of ideas and beliefs.
Since no definition of God is inherently correct or not correct, a belief in anything for which there is no empirical scientific evidence or data to support must necessarily stem from a belief in something that would most correctly be described as "God".
Since there is absolutely no empirical evidence to support the fact that anything is 100% true outside our own limited perceptions, any belief in objective reality or truth then necessarily stems from a belief in what humanity has decided to term "God".
That is why.
you would believe in flying kiwi's darwinning, that would be "God" to you if that's what you believed. There is no scientific definition of God. God has not been considered by science. Flying Kiwi's work, so do spaghetti monsters. Once you define and claim to know exactly what "God" is, however, you quickly lose all credibility.
im listening to it now summerequeen
