(December 19, 2011 at 10:48 am)amkerman Wrote: Since no definition of God is inherently correct or not correct, a belief in anything for which there is no empirical scientific evidence or data to support must necessarily stem from a belief in something that would most correctly be described as "God".
By that same convoluted logic, the exact same belief could correctly be described as a belief in something that is most definitely not "God".
If you define God as something that cannot be defined, that does not imply that everything that cannot be defined is God.