Rhizomorph: It is impossible to prove God.
If donuts are tasty, that means that taste must actually objectively exists, not a tasteless taster as you put it. Taste is based solely on perceptions of a conscious entity (humans). If taste is real, it necessitates a belief that consciousness is a primary function of the universe, which would most correctly be termed a monotheistic deity. It is illogical for someone to actually believe they in taste yet claim they don't believe in "God".
It is entirely rational that taste is simply a subjective perception of conscious beings and in reality any taste is merely a certain brain-state. But that doesn't fit most peoples experiences. Most people sense that taste is real, they can predict what taste they will sense when they eat a particular food, most people actually believe that things have taste inherent to them regardless or whether or not they are consciously perceiving that taste.
If donuts are tasty, that means that taste must actually objectively exists, not a tasteless taster as you put it. Taste is based solely on perceptions of a conscious entity (humans). If taste is real, it necessitates a belief that consciousness is a primary function of the universe, which would most correctly be termed a monotheistic deity. It is illogical for someone to actually believe they in taste yet claim they don't believe in "God".
It is entirely rational that taste is simply a subjective perception of conscious beings and in reality any taste is merely a certain brain-state. But that doesn't fit most peoples experiences. Most people sense that taste is real, they can predict what taste they will sense when they eat a particular food, most people actually believe that things have taste inherent to them regardless or whether or not they are consciously perceiving that taste.
